Screening
Read, ranked, and nothing thrown away.
Keyword filters reject people for using the wrong synonym. This reads the application against the role you described, and puts every one of them in order with its reasoning visible.
A rank is a position, not a verdict
Fourth place still gets a first interview. That is the difference between ranking and filtering, and it is the whole reason the ordering is safe to publish: it changes what you read first, not who gets a chance.
Each position carries a written reason in plain language. When the reason is wrong — and it sometimes is, because a CV is a lossy document — you can see that it is wrong, which you cannot do with a match percentage.
Applications · Field Service Technician
- 01
Nine years commercial RTU work. Holds EPA 608 Universal. 14 miles.
Meets every requirement
- 02
Seven years residential, some light commercial. 608 Type II only.
One ticket short
- 03
Twelve years, but all new construction — no service calls listed.
Different shape of work
- 04
Two years, apprenticeship completed, strong references named.
Junior for the posting
All four are interviewed — the rank filters nobody. Order decides what you read first. Invitations go by text, so anyone who declined texts is flagged for you to email instead.
Also automatic
The handful of facts a CV never answers
Sent by text, because the people worth hiring in the trades are not sitting at a desk waiting for email.
Answered by the candidate, in writing, before anyone spends twenty minutes on an interview. A “no” here is still not a rejection — it is a fact on the record for the person who decides.