The report

A number is an accusation. A quote is an argument.

This is the artifact the whole product exists to produce — the thing a hiring manager opens on a Tuesday morning and acts on.

Interview report

M. Okafor · Field Service Technician

Duration
21:40
Questions
9
Completed
06:12
Diagnostic reasoning4/5
Thermostat was reading fine, so everyone said board. I put a meter on the transformer — 8 volts. It was a shorted C-wire behind the drywall.

Isolated the fault by measurement rather than by replacement.

Working unsupervised5/5
I photograph what I found, price the options, and text the owner before I touch anything. I have never had a callback argument when there is a photo.

Documents before acting; anticipates the dispute rather than the task.

Safety practice4/5
Panel had no working main disconnect. I shut the job down and told the GC we needed the utility out first. He was not happy.

Held the line under commercial pressure and named the tradeoff honestly.

Customer handling3/5
If they are angry I let them finish. Usually they are angry at the last guy, not me.

Sound instinct, thinly evidenced — only one example offered.

  • Measures before replacing — will not parts-cannon a repair.
  • Documents work unprompted; low callback risk.
  • Will stop a job on a genuine safety fault.
  • Only one customer-conflict example, and it was second-hand.
  • No commercial rooftop work mentioned. The role has some.

Rooftop and RTU experience, and one worked example of a customer de-escalation they handled personally start to finish.

HireWRX has not decided anything. It cannot.

DeclineAdvance to second

What is in it

Six parts, and one deliberate absence

Scores, with receipts

Each competency is scored against the requirements you described in intake — and the sentence the candidate said that produced the score sits directly underneath it. If you disagree with a four, you can see the four and argue with it.

Worth asking about

Not 'concerns' and not 'red flags'. Things the interview did not get to the bottom of, phrased as questions for a human to ask. A thin answer is recorded as thin, not converted into a negative verdict.

What a second interview should cover

The single most useful paragraph in the document, and the one that saves the most time: it tells whoever runs round two exactly where to start instead of repeating round one.

The full transcript

Kept and readable in full. Every competency score carries the candidate's own sentence that produced it, so nothing in the summary is unverifiable.

A verdict you can overrule

There is a score and a recommendation, and both are advisory. They sit on top of the evidence rather than in place of it — every competency shows the sentence that earned it, so you can disagree with a number and see exactly what you are disagreeing with. Nothing acts on them: no score advances, declines or filters anyone.

Your decision, recorded

When you advance or decline, your reason is stored against the candidate. That record is what makes the process defensible months later — to a candidate, to a regulator, or to yourself.

What the overall score is, and what it cannot do

The report gives an overall score and a recommendation. Both are advisory, and this is the part worth understanding: the moment a report leads with one number, that number tends to become the decision. People sort by it, filter on it, and stop reading the part underneath — and the part underneath is the only part that is actually evidence.

So the number never gets to act. There is no threshold that advances anyone, none that declines anyone, and no setting that creates one. It cannot rank a shortlist for you or filter a pile. It is a summary of an argument that is printed directly beneath it, competency by competency, each carrying the sentence the candidate actually said — and if you disagree with a score, you are looking at the evidence you would use to argue with it.

A score that decides is the thing we are trying to stop. A score that has to show its working, and that no machine is allowed to act on, is just a summary — and the decision stays where it belongs.